Prepending the trouble

28 January 2021

January 27 of the year 2021 was marked with quite a peculiar route leak. AS61666 - GLOBO started announcing prefixes of its upstream provider MHNET - AS28146 to its another provider ALGAR - AS16735. In three minutes GLOBO leaked 1330 prefixes, and the whole routing incident lasted for 8 minutes - a time that was enough to create 1435 conflicts in 21 countries with 265 ASNs, mainly in Brazil (194 ASNs), United States (22 ASNs) and Venezuela (7 ASNs).

This incident distributed among 86% of BGP speakers at its peak, which is a significant percentage. Almost 10% of the prefixes in leak had Invalid ROA (154 prefixes) and did not help prevent the spreading.

But what is even more impressive with this route leak is that these paths had a HUGE prepend within their AS_PATH attribute - 16(!).

In a normal situation, prefixes with such heavily prepended AS_PATHs distribute poorly, as usually a more lightweight and shorter alternative route could be found and, eventually, taken as the best. However, in this leak, we see a lot of prepended AS_PATHs that managed to distribute globally. How did that happen?

The shorter route won’t win the path challenge if there’s no such route. In this case, the distribution was better on leaked routes only for those prefixes that before the incident weren’t globally distributed (indicating local use).

It turns out that almost all such prefixes, beforehand, were covered by less specific prefixes - meaning that the local /24 leaked in the incident was covered by a globally distributed /23 before the incident. If there existed any service inside those networks - before the leak, they were available through the less specific and regular routes. After (and during) the incident more specific prefixes with humongous prepends broke out and started distributing, therefore taking all the traffic through the leaked link.

So in this particular case, even tremendous prepend wasn’t a problem for the leaked prefixes global distribution because of their prior local use.

Get your Report

Full name *
Work email *
Job Title *
Company name *

I acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions set forth in Qrator Labs’ Privacy Policy.

Survey

Share your experience and expectations regarding DDoS protection. Your answers will help us tailor solutions to meet your cybersecurity needs.

Tell us about your company’s infrastructure and critical systems. This will help us understand the scope of protection you require.

Help us learn about how decisions are made in your company. This information will guide us in offering the most relevant solutions.

Let us know what drives your choices when it comes to DDoS protection. Your input will help us focus on what matters most to you.

1/4. Questions about Awareness and Needs Questions about Infrastructure Questions about Decision-Making Questions about Motivation
What is most important to you when choosing an Anti-DDoS solution? (select multiple options)
Who in your company makes decisions about cybersecurity solutions?
What is your company's average internet traffic volume?
Mb
Have you encountered DDoS attacks before?
What key risks do you want to minimize with DDoS protection?
When do you plan to consider a solution for DDoS protection?
Which systems are critical for your business to protect? (select multiple options)
Does your company have a solution to protect against DDoS attacks?
What is your company’s primary type of activity?
What level of DDoS protection do you consider sufficient?
Team size:
Thank you for completing the survey!
Your participation will help us produce better market analytics.
Thank you for staying with us!
If the document does not load, please click the "Download" button. Help us better understand the market and prepare better analytics, take the survey.
Your subscription successfully activated
Type
Name
Email
Phone Number
Write your message